Construction company Newkirk Novak issued a Public Notice in relation to the Clean Water Act
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has issued a proposed Administrative Penalty Assessment against Newkirk Novak Construction Partners, Inc. The Docket ID for this case is CWA-07-2024-0095.
The EPA alleges that the company violated its National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System construction stormwater permit and Section 402 of the Clean Water Act during the construction of the Raytown High School New Auxiliary Gym in Raytown, Missouri. Specifically, the company is accused of failing to install and maintain best management practices, missing required inspections, and other violations related to the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan.
The proposed Administrative Penalty Assessment against Newkirk Novak Construction Partners, Inc. is being made public, and a proposed Expedited Settlement Agreement between the EPA and the company is available for download. The proposed civil penalty for the alleged violations is $4,920.
Persons wishing to obtain additional information, review the proposed Expedited Settlement Agreement, or participate in the proceeding should contact the Regional Hearing Clerk. Comments on the proposed Administrative Penalty Assessment can be submitted for a period of thirty days from the date of publication. The email address for submitting comments is r7_hearing_clerk_filings@our website.
The Clean Water Act (CWA) is the program/statute involved in this case. The EPA will not issue a final order assessing a penalty prior to forty days from the date of this notice. The procedures for submitting comments, participating in the proceeding, or requesting a hearing are set forth in the Consolidated Rules.
It is important to note that this article provides a summary of the information available in the EPA's notice. For more detailed information, it may be necessary to check official environmental agency press releases, enforcement databases, or legal filings related to Clean Water Act enforcement for the relevant jurisdiction.
- The accused violations, as stated in the EPA's notice, are centred around the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System and the Clean Water Act during the construction of a high school gym.
- The company, Newkirk Novak Construction Partners, Inc., is alleged to have failed to implement and maintain best management practices and missed required inspections.
- A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan was not adhered to during the construction process, according to the EPA's claims against the company.
- The proposed penalty for the alleged violations is $4,920, mentioned in the EPA's Administrative Penalty Assessment.
- The proposed Expedited Settlement Agreement between the EPA and the company is available for download on the specific email address.
- Interested parties can acquire additional information, review the proposed Expedited Settlement Agreement, or participate in the proceeding by contacting the Regional Hearing Clerk.
- To submit comments on the proposed Administrative Penalty Assessment, a period of thirty days from the date of publication is allowed.
- The Clean Water Act (CWA) serves as the program/statute for this case, as indicated in the EPA's notice.
- Persons seeking detailed information might have to consult official environmental agency press releases, enforcement databases, or legal filings concerning Clean Water Act enforcement within the relevant jurisdiction.
- The projected final order by the EPA and the penalty assessment will take place forty days from the date of the notice, as outlined in the Consolidated Rules.
- Understanding the impact of such pollution violations on the environment, industrial manufacturing, and personal-finance-related real-estate, for example, might lead one to consider investing in technology solutions for water conservation or data-and-cloud-computing energy-efficient strategies. One could also choose to implement home-and-garden practices, support environmental science, or perhaps advocate for stricter enforcement in the industry through voter-driven changes in policy, sponsored sports events, or travel-fueled environmental awareness campaigns. Additionally, shopping choices might reflect an eco-friendly lifestyle, emphasizing sustainability and responsible practices in product sourcing, production, and disposal.
